|
“Should We
Let Others Define Us?
“He who controls the language,
controls the minds of the people.”
Think on These:
Should
definitions given by one group to maximize themselves and minimize others be accepted
and repeated until they become the norm?
Ø Should we consider phrases like, “third world” and
“minority group,” attempts to define groups of people as inferior and
separate them from the rest of humanity?
Earth is the third planet, but there is only one
world. If the intent is to define
those nations that do not have nuclear capability, then that should be said,
or is it an insidious attempt to plant a subconscious thought that some
inhabitants of the planet are expendable and do not really belonging here.
Ø Since the collective majority of the people on the planet
are not the ones who instituted the phrase, “minority group,” to define them,
is lumping the majority of the people of the planet into one group called minority
a twist on the language intended to implant in them a feeling of inferiority
while implanting the reverse to the group that is smaller in numbers?
Think on These:
Ø Should indigenous people of one country be identified by
the name of another country because the “explorer” got lost?
When
identifying people, such as the indigenous people of the now Americas as
“Indians” the nationality of people of India, a country half-way around the
world, does that implant the seed that those people are foreigners in their
own land, therefore, it is alright to
take it away from them?
Ø
When using those words
to define self, are members of the groups maligned relegating their wills to
others and being complicit in their own demeaning?
Ø - Think on
These
©2006 Elyse Curtis, Ph. D.
Science of Light
All Rights Reserved
Return to Top
|